FOR FILINGS BEING POSTED IN ALL CASES SUBSEQUENT TO JULY 1, 2022 SEE THE SEPARATE FLORIDA LITIGATIONS DROP-DOWN MENU CONTAINING EACH CASE NAME. THE DROPDOWN MENU ALSO INCLUDES KEY APPLICABLE FILINGS PRIOR TO JULY 1, 2022, WHICH MAY ALSO BE SHOWN BELOW.
DISCOVER BANK, N.A. v EVAN GUTMAN CPA, JD – Florida 4th District Court of Appeal
JUNE 20, 2022 – APPELLANT’S BRIEF OF EVAN GUTMAN CPA, JD in case of DISCOVER BANK, N.A. v EVAN GUTMAN- Appellant Brief Filed June 20, 2022
APRIL 11, 2022 Submissions Sent to UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT for Filing :
APRIL 11, 2022 – MOTION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT TO DECLARE U.S. SUPREME COURT RULE 33 UNCONSTITUTIONAL – Sent to U.S. Supreme Court on April 11, 2022
APRIL 11, 2022 – PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORIARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA – Sent to U.S. Supreme Court on April 11, 2022
On January 18, 2022 Evan Gutman CPA, JD sent to the Florida Supreme Court a MOTION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT via U.S. Mail. It is Mr. Gutman’s position this Motion can improve the quality of Adjudicative Justice for all Litigants. A complete copy of the MOTION is provided below in PDF format.
MOTION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT sent to FLORIDA SUPREME COURT (Click Below):
In addition to improving the quality of Adjudicative Justice for all Litigants, Mr. Gutman’s goals also include educating debt collector attorneys that the practice of filing a multitude of legally Meritless Credit Card Complaints against uneducated Impoverished litigants is not acceptable.
The following Motion and Documents were filed by Evan Gutman CPA, JD, in the Palm Beach Circuit Court on the dates shown. These documents pertain to the underlying Case in the Palm Beach Circuit Court of DISCOVER BANK v EVAN S. GUTMAN, PRO SE., Case #50-2019-CA-013570-XXXX-MB.
CITIBANK N.A. v EVAN S. GUTMAN
The SECOND Key Case, which will assist in accomplishing the goals of educating debt collector attorneys pertains to the case of CITIBANK, N.A. v EVAN S. GUTMAN, Pro Se, Case #50-2020-CC-005756-XXXX-MB.
DECEMBER 27 2021 – DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF COURT ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO AMEND COUNTERCLAIM
FEBRUARY 21, 2021 – DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COUNTERCLAIM TO ALLOW CLAIM FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES
CAVALRY SPV I, LLC v EVAN S. GUTMAN
The THIRD Case is CAVALRY SPV I, LLC v EVAN S GUTMAN. This particular case provides the opportunity to legally knock out hundreds and perhaps thousands of Meritless Filings made by “ASSIGNEES” of Major National Banks (in this case Citibank was the Assignor to Cavalry) and their debt collector attorneys. Each of the three cases provides its own “UNIQUE” opportunity to reform the debt collection Industry on behalf of uneducated impoverished litigants. In turn, the Florida State Supreme Court Motion has the potential to “Change the rules, so litigations become more FAIR with an equal and even playing field” so to speak. Here is the key Motion filed by Evan Gutman CPA, JD, in the Palm Beach County County Court in the “CAVALRY SPV” case, which is anticipated to be Ruled upon in the future.