2013 SUPPLEMENT TO STATE BAR ADMISSIONS AND THE BOOTLEGGER’S SON

CLICK BELOW FOR FULL BOOK:

FULL 2013 SUPPLEMENT TO STATE BAR ADMISSIONS AND THE BOOTLEGGER’S SON – A GREAT BOOK !!!

 

OR CLICK BELOW FOR INDIVIDUAL CHAPTERS TO READ SEPARATELY :

 

1 – INTRODUCTION – JUDGES AND OTHER PRISONERS

 

2 – THE NEW US SUPREME COURT – LEADER OF THE NATION’S LEGAL PROFESSION OR JUST A MERE PHILOSOPHICAL ADVISORY BOARD

 

3 – NO ICKY CASES

 

4 – THE POINT WHERE CITING CASES, PROOFS AND EXAMPLES BECOMES MEANINGLESS

 

5 – THE JUDICIARY’S I’M MY OWN GRANDPA LOGIC

 

6 – WHO’s on FIRST and WHAT’s on SECOND, BUT THE OREGON COURT OF APPEALS DOESN’T KNOW THE MEANING OF “THIRD” BASE

 

7 – THE NEED TO INCREASE JUDICIAL SALARIES – IF YOU PAY FOR CRAP, YOU GET CRAP

 

8 – STATUTORY RULES OF CONSTRUCTION PERTAINING TO PRAYER

 

9 – THE MORAL OBLIGATION TO REPAY YOUR DEBT TO THE UNIVERSE

 

10 – CURRENT DISSENTING STATE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES WILL SOON LEAD THE MAJORITY

 

11 – THE DIMINISHING LEVERAGE OF GOVERNMENT UPON THE ELDERLY

 

12 – THE NEW AMERICAN LEGAL DICTIONARY

 

13 – STREET GANGS AND OTHER MEMBERS OF THE JUDICIARY

 

14 – THE LUXURY OF BEING THE LOSING LITIGANT

 

15 – SOME GOOD NEWS FOR THE AVERAGE CITIZEN

 

16 – MY CASE IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ONE EVER

 

17 – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF STATE SUPREME COURTS IN THE 21st CENTURY AND THE GERMAN JUDICIARY IN THE 1930s

 

18 – THE IRRATIONAL NATURE OF SO CALLED RATIONAL BASIS SCRUTINY

 

19 – THE INTERSECTION OF THE FIRST AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS

 

20 – THE PRACTICE OF LAW IS A FUNDAMENTAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT

 

21 – THE IRRATIONAL INFIRMITY OF EQUAL PROTECTION JURISPRUDENCE

 

22 – BALANCING THE FIT BETWEEN MEANS AND ENDS IN EPC JURISPRUDENCE

 

23 – the PRIMARY FUNCTION OF THE JUDICIARY IS TO KEEP IGNORANT LEGISLATORS IN CHECK

 

24 – PROPOSED STATE BAR EXAMINATION ESSAY QUESTION

 

25 – HOW COULD THE ARIZONA SUPREME COURT ALLOW ITSELF TO LOOK SO STUPID IN THE HAMM AND KING CASES

 

26 – THE OHIO SUPREME COURT HOOKER PROGRAM FOR PURCHASING JUDICIAL OPINIONS

 

27 – IN DEFENSE OF THE CONDUCT OF NJ SUPREME COURT JUSTICE ROBERTO RIVERA SOTO

 

28 – THE ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT GUIDE TO CONVERTING YOUR JUDICIAL OFFICE INTO A GET RICH QUICK SCHEME

 

29 – A TRUE AMERICAN HERO – FEDERAL DISTRICT JUDGE ANNA DIGGS TAYLOR

 

30 – FISA – A CONGRESSIONAL ENACTMENT TO SUPPLEMENT PRESIDENTIAL POWER

 

31 – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION OF THE PHRASES “ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE” AND “GOOD MORAL CHARACTER”

 

32 – IN RE GATTI

 

33 – HUMPTY DUMPTY’S TYRANNY OF WORDS REVISTED

 

34 – WE ARE ALL JEFFERSONIANS

 

35 – THE GREATEST AND LONELIEST AMERICAN EVER CHARLES SUMNER

 

36 – THE PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH KNOWING GOD’S EXISTENCE WITH CONCLUSIVE CERTAINTY

 

37 – THE NUMBER ONE DUMB-ASS US SUPREME COURT OPINION – BELL V WOLFISH

 

38 – WHY AREN’T PETITIONS FOR CERT TO USC ON PACER

 

39 – IT IS LOGISTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES TO PERFORM THEIR JOB COMPETENTLY

 

40 – THE REAL ESSENCE OF ALL GOVERNMENTS IS ON THE TWENTY DOLLAR BILL

 

41 – THE ART OF LEVERAGING THE JUDICIARY BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT

 

42 – UNWRITTEN RULES OF COURTESY AND CIVILITY INDICATE A JUDICIAL PROPENSITY TOWARD IMMORALITY

 

43 – MALES AND FEMALES ARE INTELLECTUAL EQUALS – WHICH DOESN’T SAY TOO MUCH FOR EITHER

 

44 – IDIOCRACY, PHILOSOPHY AND THE DUMBING DOWN OF STATE BARS

 

45 – THE IMMORALITY OF NJ SUPREME COURT JUSTICES EVIDENCED BY – CREWS V CREWS

 

46 – THE IMMORALITY OF NJ LEGISLATORS EVIDENCED BY KNOWN FALSE ASSUMPTIONS IN CHILD SUPPORT TABLES

 

47 – CLINICAL TREATMENT FOR THE BRAIN DISEASE “OLCD” (Oregon Legislative Cognitive Deficiency) – ORS 107.169(3) and 107.169(5)

 

48 – CONCLUSION – THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE, PULITZER PRIZE and DISBARMENT

 

49 – APPENDIX – A TRIBUTE TO JUSTICE RICHARD B SANDERS

 

50 – FOOTNOTES FOR SUPPLEMENT